<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What if There is no Democratic Convention?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.politicallore.com/politics/election-2008/what-if-there-is-no-democratic-convention/324/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.politicallore.com/politics/election-2008/what-if-there-is-no-democratic-convention/324</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:09:35 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eieio</title>
		<link>http://www.politicallore.com/politics/election-2008/what-if-there-is-no-democratic-convention/324/comment-page-1#comment-8471</link>
		<dc:creator>Eieio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicallore.com/?p=324#comment-8471</guid>
		<description>Too bad the unspoken &quot;rules&quot; about the Convention changed this year and left Denver, small donors and taxpayers holding the bag.  Follow the money.  The Denver host committee is an independent &quot;non-partisan&quot; 501(c)(3) organization.  Donations to it are tax deductible.  The Democratic National Committee and Democratic National Convention Committee are &quot;political&quot; (527) organizations.  Contributions are not tax-deductible.  

The DNC/DNCC have a contract with the Denver host committee that imposes fund-raising deadlines.  In past years, when the committee fell short, the nominee&#039;s campaign (and wealthy donors) made up the difference.  This year, the campaign has &quot;directed all inquiries&quot; about the fund-raising shortfall back to the host committee while the campaign finance chair has told large donors not to give to independent organizations.  Seems like a double bind to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad the unspoken &#8220;rules&#8221; about the Convention changed this year and left Denver, small donors and taxpayers holding the bag.  Follow the money.  The Denver host committee is an independent &#8220;non-partisan&#8221; 501(c)(3) organization.  Donations to it are tax deductible.  The Democratic National Committee and Democratic National Convention Committee are &#8220;political&#8221; (527) organizations.  Contributions are not tax-deductible.  </p>
<p>The DNC/DNCC have a contract with the Denver host committee that imposes fund-raising deadlines.  In past years, when the committee fell short, the nominee&#8217;s campaign (and wealthy donors) made up the difference.  This year, the campaign has &#8220;directed all inquiries&#8221; about the fund-raising shortfall back to the host committee while the campaign finance chair has told large donors not to give to independent organizations.  Seems like a double bind to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotia</title>
		<link>http://www.politicallore.com/politics/election-2008/what-if-there-is-no-democratic-convention/324/comment-page-1#comment-8470</link>
		<dc:creator>Scotia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicallore.com/?p=324#comment-8470</guid>
		<description>You twit. It&#039;s not the DNC but the City of Denver that can&#039;t pony up their part of the cost. Any city hosting a convention like this will offer a certain amount of money to the convention. They get it back in sales and income and business taxes.  Too bad Denver didn&#039;t hit the mark.

The reasons are many and one of which would be the Obama/Clinton race that just ended. Let&#039;s give Denver and Colorado some time to get the money together.

If you have the balls, look at the coffers of both parties and you will see that D&#039;s have an advantage.

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You twit. It&#8217;s not the DNC but the City of Denver that can&#8217;t pony up their part of the cost. Any city hosting a convention like this will offer a certain amount of money to the convention. They get it back in sales and income and business taxes.  Too bad Denver didn&#8217;t hit the mark.</p>
<p>The reasons are many and one of which would be the Obama/Clinton race that just ended. Let&#8217;s give Denver and Colorado some time to get the money together.</p>
<p>If you have the balls, look at the coffers of both parties and you will see that D&#8217;s have an advantage.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
