WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Rand Paul today released the latest edition to ‘The
Waste Report,’ which is an ongoing project cataloguing egregious examples of waste
within the U.S. government.
The latest edition uncovers a $450,000 project at the National Science Foundation
(NSF) to produce a video game aimed to educate students about global climate change
and how to prevent it. The initiative, known as the Climate Change Narrative Game
Education (CHANGE), creates a video game set 110 years in the future, which the NSF
claims to be “scientifically realistic.”
‘The Waste Report’ can be found
A whole generation remembers the thrill of strolling into an elementary school
computer lab, firing up an Apple II computer, and playing The Oregon Trail. Well,
thanks to an almost $450,000 grant from the National Science Foundation, it appears
a whole new generation of students will have their own iconic game…on climate
Apparently “[e]ducating young people about Global Climate Change (GCC) is
challenging because they have difficulty relating to its slow pace, with larger
effects 10s-100s years in to the future.” How to solve that problem? A video game
aimed at indoctrinating kids into the climate change way of thinking.
The Climate Change Narrative Game Education (CHANGE), which is being developed by
researchers at the University of South Florida and piloted at Hillsborough County
high schools, aims to counter this morass by, “develop[ing] a place-based futuristic
gaming simulation model…” Of course, the CHANGE project is all supposed to be
The game will involve a science fiction narrative of the effects of climate change on the students’ community as told by virtual persons from the future. This, “focus
on the built environment will help students attach a ‘human face’ and a sense of
immediacy to hitherto abstract issues of global warming.” The first part of the game
will ask students to deal with simulations like severe weather and sea-level rise,
while the second part of the game will group students in teams to create plans to
“save the future.”
How far in the future? Well, 110 years. Recall that Doc Brown and Marty only went 30
years in the future; and while Back to The Future was a great movie trilogy,
accurately predicting just 30 years in the future proved pretty hard.
Perhaps the government, instead of Hollywood is better at predicting the future?
Take for example Dr. John Holdren, who is the President’s Chief Science Advisor and
was a technical advisor on former Vice President Al Gore’s movie An Inconvenient
Truth. In 1986, he predicted 1 billion people would die as a result of global
warming by the year 2020. At his 2009 confirmation hearing he was asked if he still
believed climate change would kill 1 billion by 2020. He said, “I think it could
happen.” Scared yet?
Here’s a prediction: the real science behind this game is psychology and political